Difference between revisions of "Category talk:The Goliath Chronicles"
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ==Out-of-universe?== | ||
+ | So, the Out-of-Universe category is a list of all publications of/related to Gargoyles, and the category description says nothing about canonity. So should this article and the Marvel Comics article be in there? --- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 23:05, 26 December 2007 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :The ''articles'' should be, yes (aren't they?), but I'm not sure the categories should. The categories also contain in-universe info. I think the categories should stay where they are, but the articles, e.g. [[The Goliath Chronicles]] should definitely be in the out-of-universe category. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 11:25, 27 December 2007 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::I agree. As far as I can tell, neither the articles nor the categories are in Out-of-Universe. -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 12:18, 27 December 2007 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::Category has been added to [[The Goliath Chronicles]]. We don't have a general article for Marvle Comics, do we? -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 12:41, 27 December 2007 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::::Marvel Comics is a category. There are no introductory articles for Marvel Comics or Disney Adventures. -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 12:46, 27 December 2007 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Apocrypha section== | ||
This may be totally minor, but the Apocrypha section seems a bit messy. | This may be totally minor, but the Apocrypha section seems a bit messy. | ||
Line 4: | Line 17: | ||
My feeling is that the Marvel Comics and Goliath Chronicles categories should be classified in the same way. -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 14:27, 19 December 2007 (CST) | My feeling is that the Marvel Comics and Goliath Chronicles categories should be classified in the same way. -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 14:27, 19 December 2007 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :You're right, of course. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 09:33, 20 December 2007 (CST) | ||
+ | :Done. Probably the Disney Adventures pages we've got should go into the Apocrypha Episodes category at some point as well. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 09:54, 20 December 2007 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 11:46, 27 December 2007
Out-of-universe?
So, the Out-of-Universe category is a list of all publications of/related to Gargoyles, and the category description says nothing about canonity. So should this article and the Marvel Comics article be in there? --- Vaevictis Asmadi 23:05, 26 December 2007 (CST)
- The articles should be, yes (aren't they?), but I'm not sure the categories should. The categories also contain in-universe info. I think the categories should stay where they are, but the articles, e.g. The Goliath Chronicles should definitely be in the out-of-universe category. -- Supermorff 11:25, 27 December 2007 (CST)
- I agree. As far as I can tell, neither the articles nor the categories are in Out-of-Universe. -- Vaevictis Asmadi 12:18, 27 December 2007 (CST)
- Category has been added to The Goliath Chronicles. We don't have a general article for Marvle Comics, do we? -- Supermorff 12:41, 27 December 2007 (CST)
- Marvel Comics is a category. There are no introductory articles for Marvel Comics or Disney Adventures. -- Vaevictis Asmadi 12:46, 27 December 2007 (CST)
Apocrypha section
This may be totally minor, but the Apocrypha section seems a bit messy.
The Marvel Comics category contains two sub-categories, Marvel Comics characters, Marvel Comics issues. Meanwhile the Apocrypha Episodes category has the Marvel Comics issues as a subcategory, but the TGC episodes without a sub-category.
My feeling is that the Marvel Comics and Goliath Chronicles categories should be classified in the same way. -- Vaevictis Asmadi 14:27, 19 December 2007 (CST)
- You're right, of course. -- Supermorff 09:33, 20 December 2007 (CST)
- Done. Probably the Disney Adventures pages we've got should go into the Apocrypha Episodes category at some point as well. -- Supermorff 09:54, 20 December 2007 (CST)