Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pine Lawn"
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Yeah... the whole idea just didn't work. So now there's no Structures category or Landmarks category or anything. And, frankly, I no longer think such a category is necessary. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 17:14, 13 September 2007 (CDT) | :Yeah... the whole idea just didn't work. So now there's no Structures category or Landmarks category or anything. And, frankly, I no longer think such a category is necessary. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 17:14, 13 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::xD I forgot the Structures category is gone now! -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 21:21, 13 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:21, 13 September 2007
I think it should be moved back to structures. It's a cemetary, not a building. -Vaevictis Asmadi
- You mean moved back to "Places" from "Structures"? Your call. I used the word "structure" strictly in its "something constructed" definition. I'm slightly regretting not using the word "Landmark" instead, which would also incorporate natural features as well. Bit late now, I suppose. If you want to change it, go ahead, but you'll need to change the definition given on the "Category:Structure" page. -- Supermorff 06:35, 17 March 2007 (CDT)
Ah I see, I misunderstood what you meant by structures. I was thinking it meant buildings. -Vaevictis Asmadi
Yanno, you could always incorporate Structures into a larger subcategory. But the the word "landmarks" can also include natural landmarks like Old Faithful, Chimney Rock, Victoria Falls, etc. -- Vaevictis Asmadi 14:26, 13 September 2007 (CDT)
- Yeah... the whole idea just didn't work. So now there's no Structures category or Landmarks category or anything. And, frankly, I no longer think such a category is necessary. -- Supermorff 17:14, 13 September 2007 (CDT)
- xD I forgot the Structures category is gone now! -- Vaevictis Asmadi 21:21, 13 September 2007 (CDT)
