Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Canon-in-training"

From GargWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(CiT question...?)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Some of the articles here are all in bold, some are not in bold, and some are partly in bold and partly in regular type. Is this deliberate? I had thought bold text was used mainly to distinguish canon-in-training information in mostly canon articles. - Vaevictis Asmadi
+
Okay, I'm not a big Wiki genius, so someone explain to me this: When the "[[London Clan]]" CiT template was first shown, the CiT parts were written in blue. I thought this was fine. Now everyone is updating all the entries to say [[CiT|... and yet the entries still look exactly the same to me. Why are they still in white? What exactly is changing? --[[User:Matt|Matt]] 16:35, 5 September 2007 (CST)
−
 
 
−
:I've noticed that too. I can only assume that it is not deliberate, but because there is no guideline or consensus for canon-in-training articles. Shall we establish one? -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 04:00, 5 March 2007 (CST)
 

Revision as of 14:36, 5 September 2007

Okay, I'm not a big Wiki genius, so someone explain to me this: When the "London Clan" CiT template was first shown, the CiT parts were written in blue. I thought this was fine. Now everyone is updating all the entries to say [[CiT|... and yet the entries still look exactly the same to me. Why are they still in white? What exactly is changing? --Matt 16:35, 5 September 2007 (CST)

Retrieved from "https://www.gargwiki.net/index.php?title=Category_talk:Canon-in-training&oldid=9857"