Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Places"
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I considered all of them. Places by canonicity probably aren't worth it, since there's only a handful that aren't actually canon (off the top of my head, [[Gen-U-Tech Island]] (Apocryphal) and [[Castle Carbonek]], [[New Camelot]], [[Crystal Cave]] (Canon-in-training). There may be a couple more). I did seriously think about making "[[:Category:Real world places]]", though. I'll help if you start. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 06:41, 17 March 2007 (CDT) | :I considered all of them. Places by canonicity probably aren't worth it, since there's only a handful that aren't actually canon (off the top of my head, [[Gen-U-Tech Island]] (Apocryphal) and [[Castle Carbonek]], [[New Camelot]], [[Crystal Cave]] (Canon-in-training). There may be a couple more). I did seriously think about making "[[:Category:Real world places]]", though. I'll help if you start. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 06:41, 17 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Well I went ahead and made that category. And having reconsidered things, places by canonicity might be useful after all. Or, at least, [[Category:Canon places]] might be useful. Uncertain about the other two. I'll keep thinking about it. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 15:56, 21 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:56, 21 March 2007
Is it alright if I create a sub-category for Real World Places? I don't know for certain for some of these entries, whether they are real, but I can start. Does anyone else think that Canon Places, Canon-in-Training Places, and Apocryphal Places categories would be useful? -Vaevictis Asmadi
- I considered all of them. Places by canonicity probably aren't worth it, since there's only a handful that aren't actually canon (off the top of my head, Gen-U-Tech Island (Apocryphal) and Castle Carbonek, New Camelot, Crystal Cave (Canon-in-training). There may be a couple more). I did seriously think about making "Category:Real world places", though. I'll help if you start. -- Supermorff 06:41, 17 March 2007 (CDT)
- Well I went ahead and made that category. And having reconsidered things, places by canonicity might be useful after all. Or, at least, might be useful. Uncertain about the other two. I'll keep thinking about it. -- Supermorff 15:56, 21 March 2007 (CDT)
