Difference between revisions of "Talk:Finella"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Finella's Son== | ==Finella's Son== | ||
| − | Are we sure the reference to Finella's son in ''[[The Gate]]'' was nothing more the [[Constantine]]'s propaganda? Finella's own response of "I--No!" sounds a tad ambiguous to me. [[User:Algernon|Algernon]] 14:05, 21 October 2009 (CDT) | + | Are we sure the reference to Finella's son in ''[[The Gate]]'' was nothing more the [[Constantine]]'s propaganda? Finella's own response of "I--No!" sounds a tad ambiguous to me. --[[User:Algernon|Algernon]] 14:05, 21 October 2009 (CDT) |
:Yeah, I second that. It seemed to me that there was some truth to that line. But who knows? I certainly don't think we should assume Finella was being entirely truthful there. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 20:41, 21 October 2009 (CDT) | :Yeah, I second that. It seemed to me that there was some truth to that line. But who knows? I certainly don't think we should assume Finella was being entirely truthful there. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 20:41, 21 October 2009 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:23, 22 October 2009
Not at all relevant
This isn't relevant to anything, but someone might find it interesting: in the 1992/1993 season there was a tropical cyclone named Finella in the south-west Indian Ocean.[1] I'll be quiet now. -- Supermorff 13:15, 16 December 2007 (CST)
Finella's Son
Are we sure the reference to Finella's son in The Gate was nothing more the Constantine's propaganda? Finella's own response of "I--No!" sounds a tad ambiguous to me. --Algernon 14:05, 21 October 2009 (CDT)
- Yeah, I second that. It seemed to me that there was some truth to that line. But who knows? I certainly don't think we should assume Finella was being entirely truthful there. -- Matt 20:41, 21 October 2009 (CDT)
