Difference between revisions of "Talk:Japan"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hmm.. not sure that is entirely necessary, though there's nothing wrong with putting it in. There is already a link to Ishimura in the article text. -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 13:38, 31 October 2007 (CDT) | Hmm.. not sure that is entirely necessary, though there's nothing wrong with putting it in. There is already a link to Ishimura in the article text. -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 13:38, 31 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | --Yeah, I kinda put it on there as an afterthought when I was adding something else. I felt that the Japan entry was rather vague and felt Ishimura could hold more information. After saving the changes I found that the Ishimura entry was even more vague. Oh well, feel free to delete it, but like you said it's not doing any harm. --[[User:Matt|Matt]] 31 October 2007 | ||
Latest revision as of 16:22, 31 October 2007
Hmm.. not sure that is entirely necessary, though there's nothing wrong with putting it in. There is already a link to Ishimura in the article text. -- Vaevictis Asmadi 13:38, 31 October 2007 (CDT)
--Yeah, I kinda put it on there as an afterthought when I was adding something else. I felt that the Japan entry was rather vague and felt Ishimura could hold more information. After saving the changes I found that the Ishimura entry was even more vague. Oh well, feel free to delete it, but like you said it's not doing any harm. --Matt 31 October 2007
