Difference between revisions of "Talk:Manhattan Clan"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:It looks like there may be technical restrictions to doing this. Even so, I don't think it a big deal as the notations following each future member makes it clear what is CiT... I just had a thought of what might work... -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 18:55, 27 September 2008 (CDT) | :It looks like there may be technical restrictions to doing this. Even so, I don't think it a big deal as the notations following each future member makes it clear what is CiT... I just had a thought of what might work... -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 18:55, 27 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | :Well, I made it work. I'm still not convinced it was neccesary, but I have no problem with it either. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 18:56, 27 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:56, 27 September 2008
Is there any way to mark the heading to the "Future Members" section go under the CIT template? I tired the most straightforward way, but it didn't seem to work. Technically, all future members are CIT and having the header in blue text would help to make it clear that all additions of future members, even those who have only the linked name listed which will not turn blue, are CIT. -- Demonskrye 18:38, 27 September 2008 (CDT)
- It looks like there may be technical restrictions to doing this. Even so, I don't think it a big deal as the notations following each future member makes it clear what is CiT... I just had a thought of what might work... -- Matt 18:55, 27 September 2008 (CDT)
- Well, I made it work. I'm still not convinced it was neccesary, but I have no problem with it either. -- Matt 18:56, 27 September 2008 (CDT)
