Difference between revisions of "Talk:London Clan"
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Well, you make a fair point. You are right, we have every reason to expect those two will be further introduced in #8. Maybe I was a bit rash, my apologies. I suppose we should keep them. I don't love it, but I can see why you'd want to do that. And by the way, thanks for the improvements to the London Clan pic! --[[User:Matt|Matt]] 09:15, 17 December 2007 (CST) | Well, you make a fair point. You are right, we have every reason to expect those two will be further introduced in #8. Maybe I was a bit rash, my apologies. I suppose we should keep them. I don't love it, but I can see why you'd want to do that. And by the way, thanks for the improvements to the London Clan pic! --[[User:Matt|Matt]] 09:15, 17 December 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Oh, no worries. It's a wiki; things get discussed and sometimes deleted. I can't take credit for the London clan pic improvements though. I think that was VA's doing. . -- [[User:Demonskrye|Demonskrye]] 9:34, 19 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Nope, the current pic is DTaina's work. -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 11:08, 19 December 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yeah, my bad. DTaina gave us a much better pic of Leo, Una and Griff. I added the two new gargs' pic. --[[User:Matt|Matt]] 11:18, 19 December 2007 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:18, 19 December 2007
I completely give up. I tried twice, but the editor won't let me upload the picture. I don't understand what is wrong with this code. -- Vaevictis Asmadi 18:57, 14 December 2007 (CST)
I added placeholders in the Known Members section for the stag-goyle and the boar-goyle. Once we learn their names, or at least more about them, we can give them their own pages and proper links. -- Demonskrye 20:27, 16 December 2007 (EST)
Is this at all neccesary at this point? We've seen lots of members of various clans (Wyvern Clan, Avalon Clan and Ishimura Clan) that were never named on screen. This does not mean we are gonna leave placeholders for all of them? Should we put 36 placeholders in the Known Members section of the Avalon Clan? Where do we draw the line on this? Honestly, I think it looks kinda bad too. --Matt 00:12, 17 December 2007 (CST)
- In this case, I'm mostly thinking that the two gargoyles we saw will almost certainly be further introduced when issue #8 comes out. It also prevents anyone from coming in and saying "why don't you have anything about the London clan gargoyle from the end of #7?" for the next couple of months. And I figure if we can have a full entry for "Amp" without having the slightest idea who or what "Amp" is, we can probably stand to list these two gargoyles in the known members of the clan. But I do realize this is a wiki, so if more people feel that the listings are not necessary, I'm OK with them going too.. -- Demonskrye 8:51, 17 December 2007 (EST)
Well, you make a fair point. You are right, we have every reason to expect those two will be further introduced in #8. Maybe I was a bit rash, my apologies. I suppose we should keep them. I don't love it, but I can see why you'd want to do that. And by the way, thanks for the improvements to the London Clan pic! --Matt 09:15, 17 December 2007 (CST)
- Oh, no worries. It's a wiki; things get discussed and sometimes deleted. I can't take credit for the London clan pic improvements though. I think that was VA's doing. . -- Demonskrye 9:34, 19 December 2007 (EST)
- Nope, the current pic is DTaina's work. -- Vaevictis Asmadi 11:08, 19 December 2007 (CST)
Yeah, my bad. DTaina gave us a much better pic of Leo, Una and Griff. I added the two new gargs' pic. --Matt 11:18, 19 December 2007 (CST)
