Difference between revisions of "Pendragon"

From GargWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(+intro. link edit. cat edit)
(Links: ditto)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 
*[http://www.s8.org/gargoyles/askgreg/search.php?rid=416 Greg's Ramble]
 
*[http://www.s8.org/gargoyles/askgreg/search.php?rid=416 Greg's Ramble]
 +
*[http://www.gargoyles-fans.org/reviews/ep48.htm Extensive Synopsis and Review]
  
  

Revision as of 19:34, 12 August 2007

Pendragon.JPG

"Pendragon" is the forty-eighth televised episode of the series Gargoyles, and the thirty-fifth episode of Season 2.

Summary

Tidbits

Greg Weisman intended Pendragon to be a back-door pilot to a spin-off, also entitled Pendragon, that would have dealt with King Arthur and Griff's adventures as they search for Merlin, adventures that would have taken them, among other places, to Tintagel, Stonehenge, and Antarctica. The Illuminati would have had a major role in this series as a recurring antagonist, particularly its leader, Mr. Duval, who would have turned out to be Sir Percival, a former knight of the Round Table that had survived into modern times through being the guardian of the Holy Grail. (This raises the question of how Percival can both be the Grail's guardian - an occupation that traditionally called for very high moral standards - and the head of an organization as amoral as the Illuminati. Greg commented once that Percival has had to pay a certain price for his actions as leader of the Illuminati, though he has so far refused to specify what that price was.) Arthur and Griff would also be joined by Percival's estranged wife, Blanchefleur, who would become a third regular. Greg also planned for another appearance by the Stone of Destiny, this one connected in some way with its real-life return to Scotland in late 1996. Unfortunately, the spin-off was never made (it is a sad commentary on television animation that Pendragon was rejected, while the dreadful King Arthur and the Knights of Justice received two full seasons).

Alert viewers will notice that Arthur could not have reached London immediately after leaving Avalon. For one thing, Griff is already there, indicating that the events of M.I.A. have already taken place. Also, the trio and Hudson have been contacted by Halcyon Renard and Diane Maza about the events in Golem and Mark of the Panther. According to Greg Weisman, Arthur had an unspecified adventure in the outside world that troubled him enough that he decided to return to Avalon for a time, and he was brought to London after making a second venture into the outside world.

Gargoyles here follows the popular (if inaccurate) interpretation of Excalibur and the Sword in the Stone being one and the same; in Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur, they were, in fact, separate swords. After Arthur broke his old sword (Malory does not say whether it was the Sword in the Stone or a lesser weapon) while fighting King Pellinore, Merlin brought him to the Lady of the Lake, who gave him Excalibur via the famous hand rising up from her lake garbed in a sleeve of white samite. Pendragon makes use of both concepts, having Excalibur once again embedded in stone (but this time, completely encased, with the sword seemingly thrust in the stone being just a worthless lookalike), but bringing in the Lady of the Lake as instrumental in its recovery.

An issue left unresolved is the Stone of Destiny's identity as being the stone from the Sword in the Stone. The Stone of Destiny was (according to Scottish tradition) brought to Scotland from Ireland around the year 500, to eventually become a crucial part of Scottish coronation ritual from 843 (when Kenneth mac Alpin became the first King of Scotland) to 1296 (when Edward I captured it and brought it to Westminster Abbey). Thus it did not reach London until almost eight hundred years after Arthur carried out his famous act of pulling the sword from the stone (which Malory places in London). So how can the two stones be the same? Greg has hinted that the Stone of Destiny was briefly moved to London and back for the occasion, but has declined to go into details; presumably, these would eventually have been addressed in the Pendragon spin-off (if it ever gets made).

Links


<< Previous Episode: "Mark of the Panther" Next Episode: "Eye of the Storm" >>